I knew I was going to play A Link Between Worlds, despite my initial hesitation. So I wanted to go back to a game I never bothered to complete: the very first Zelda game. We have it on the Wii’s Virtual Console, but I’m buggered if I’m going to put up with the limitations of the NES if there’s a better version available. And it turns out there is. At the BS Zelda Homepage, you can get reproductions and patches that let you play one of the most rare Zelda games: the satellite broadcast remake of Zelda 1 for the SNES. Only sent out at certain times in the 90s, the game was split into parts with timers. Hackers have stitched them together and made a few teaks, to make it the best version of the original game.
The version I played, Third Quest, uses the dungeons from the broadcast version, which are different to the original game. So it’s not 100% authentic, but close enough and the overworld is the same. They also made a few choices that probably meddle too much, like putting in the Hylian shield, but they also add other things to make it a bit more dynamic (I think, not totally sure). Also you can play as Zelda, which of course I did.
Essentially it’s a graphical and sound upgrade for Zelda 1, all the mechanics are the same. It’s not like a LttP romhack, all the sprites are brand new and look great, and are actually parseable unlike the NES version’s muddy, ugly graphics.
Of course, the graphics and sounds aren’t the only limitation of this NES era game. Movement and combat is stiff, and there’s little interaction with characters or the environment. Like a lot of SNES games, A Link to the Past is doing the same thing as the NES game it’s following, but doing it better and fleshing it out. That’s what I found with this, and I’d much rather play LttP than Zelda 1. But I did find myself having fun with this, enjoying the simplicity and the ramp up of my power, without plot distractions. I feel bad saying so, but I now feel I can give Zelda 1 a niche of its own.
I would recommend BS Zelda over the NES original any day of the week. In my mind, while it exists there’s no reason to look to the NES (apart from blind nostalgia). If you’re an impatient modern gamer like me though, have a guide handy for when you get stuck, because we’re not kids anymore and wandering the overworld endlessly can get tedious. I’m very glad for the BS version, because although I’m a completionist I just didn’t feel I could face the NES one. Similarly, I’m not sure if I’ll ever do Zelda 2. So in the end Zelda 1 was ok. Pretty forgettable in this day and age but I had some fun.

Being a fan of the DKU (as described by dkvine.com), and Rare games in general, I was interested in the Viva Pinata games. It’s the last successful new IP they’ve made since Banjo, really, and has done well for them. It’s also one of the last things they did before being totally creatively lobotomised by Microsoft. This is the only VP game on a non-Microsoft platform and hence the only one I have access to.
Hi there. I really like the wackiness of the Warioware series. It’s got a really distinct sense of fun, and the way they’re presented make them feel like a labour of love. I only ever owned DIY, and I knew I was missing out a little because that was so heavily built around the creative aspect. Other games such as Touched and Smooth Moves are allowed to be more expressive: they’re not limited by graphics you would be able to draw in the game itself, or such simplistic control schemes, and microgames are allowed more variation. They also have more modes and so on.
I finally got around to playing this. I got it back in the Famicom anniversary sale. Having played almost every Metroid game before this one (only Metroid 2 left now), I was kind of looking forward to it as the commonly-held “best” in the series.








